In
this time and age, it is delightful to see a publication which is not
doing poorly controlled correlative stuff or omics for the sake of
omics, but instead strong hypothesis driven biochemistry. The paper I
am referring to comes from the lab of Sjoerd Wanrooij in Umea
(Forslund
et al. 2018).
Now,
it has been known since the 70's that mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) has
ribonucleotides, but it has remained unclear whether they possess a
function and how they affect mtDNA maintenance and gene expression.
Until very recently, there has been very little attention given to
these ribonucleotides, but it seems this subject is becoming trendy
again. A recent paper from the Clausen lab showed for the first time
the amount and distribution of ribonucleotides in whole mtDNA and
also how the amount of ribonucleotides might be different in some
patients with changes in nucleotide pools (Berglund
et al. 2017). In this paper, Forslund et al. try to understand
whether the mitochondrial DNA polymerase (POLG) is inhibited by
ribonocleotides in the template strand or by changes in the relative
ration of NTP to dNTP.
In
the beginning of the paper Forslund et al. make a good point, which
might be missed by a lot of people not working with POLG. Back in the
90's and early 00's, people performed all POLG in
vitro experiments
using the exonuclease-deficient mutant because it makes the
experiments easier. However, it was later recognized that the
exonuclease-deficient POLG might be doing some funky things such as
increased strand-displacement (Farge
et al. 2007). For this reason, one should interpret the old
papers with some grain of salt.
I
personally like these kind of experiments, where the models used are
first established using previously published systems. Not only is
this helpful in reproducing already published findings but it really
makes you trust the experiment. I highly recommend reading the whole
thing.
The
weirdest finding of the paper is that only WT POLG but not the
exonuclease-deficient POLG is sensitive to low NTP/high rNTP
conditions. The authors suggest in the discussion that this could be
caused idling of the WT POLG between polymerase/exonuclease modes. It
is not obvious to be why the exonuclease-deficient POLG would
not idle also. Could it be that the exo- mutation somehow alters the
protein structure to have different nucleotide selection dynamics? Or
perhaps the low NTP/high rNTP condition alters the efficiency of the
WT POLG so that it will have increased removal of correct bases
leading to decreased full length synthesis? I hope they will follow
this up.
In
the discussion the authors stated that their in
vitro estimation of
ribonucleotide content in mtDNA is somewhat lower than the values
obtained from in vivo
samples. One explanation for this could be that because the
nucleotide pool sizes are so challenging to measure, it could be that
the in vitro
measurements are over-estimating the dNTP pools or under-estimating
the NTP pools. To me, this is the most parsimonious answer. They also
continue hypothesizing that some other polymerases, like Polβ or
PrimPol, could introduce ribonucleotides in
vivo. I'm yet to be
convinced that either of these polymerases would be in mitochondrial
matrix or have a mitochondrial function. For instance, depending on
the study, small amount of PrimPol localizes to mitochondria or
doesn't. Even when a fraction of PrimPol has been shown to localize
within mitochondria, in subcellular fractination it seems to be
degraded together with OPA1 (Torregrosa-Muñumer
et al. 2017), suggesting PrimPol is in the inner membrane space. I put my money on over/under-estimated nucleotide pools.
In
overall, once again strong biochemistry from Sjoerd's group.
References:
Berglund AK, Navarrete C, Engqvist MK, Hoberg E, Szilagyi Z, Taylor RW, Gustafsson CM, Falkenberg M, Clausen AR. Nucleotide pools dictate the identity and frequency of ribonucleotide incorporation in mitochondrial DNA. PLoS Genet. 2017. PMID: 28207748
Farge
G, Pham XH, Holmlund T, Khorostov I, Falkenberg M. The accessory
subunit B of DNA polymerase gamma is required for mitochondrial
replisome function. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007. PMID: 17251196
Forslund
JME, Pfeiffer A, Stojkovič G, Wanrooij PH, Wanrooij S. The presence
of rNTPs decreases the speed of mitochondrial DNA replication. PLoS
Genet. 2018 PMID: 29601571
Torregrosa-Muñumer
R, Forslund JME, Goffart S, Pfeiffer A, Stojkovič G, Carvalho G,
Al-Furoukh N, Blanco L, Wanrooij S, Pohjoismäki JLO. PrimPol is
required for replication reinitiation after mtDNA damage. Proc Natl
Acad Sci U S A. 2017. PMID:29073063
No comments:
Post a Comment